|
publications
▪ · books · ▪ · Stokoe,
E., & Laurier, E. (in preparation). Talking
relationships. Cambridge: Speer,
“Conversation and
Gender is the perfect riposte to those who assume that Conversation Analysis
cannot account for 'structural' realities. Written by a top flight collection
of scholars, this book is essential reading for anyone interested in gender
in interaction” (David Silverman, Goldsmiths College and King's
College, University of London)
"This volume will prove to be a useful resource for students and researchers who have been on the lookout for studies devoted to adopting CA as the core methodology in analyzing gender identities. This volume provides much food for thought as well as a plethora of data that may serve as a resource for students in getting hands-on experience in analyzing different types of data dealing with gender" (Journal of Pragmatics, 2011) Benwell,
B.M. & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Short-listed for the BAAL
2007 prize: “… a very welcoming focus on practical applications
to real data … covers complex territory in an accessible, coherent and
illuminating manner …” … “…an extraordinarily ambitious
and confident book, in that the coverage is both interdisciplinary and vast,
but the two authors do manage to pull this off. I was impressed!
…”. “…an
indispensable resource … a corrective to theoretical posturing” (Discourse
& Society, 2007) “… full of perceptive insights…” (Discourse
& Communication, 2007) “… what sets
this book apart … is its practical focus on how researchers identify
and analyse the process of identity construction” (Gender &
Language, 2007) “… Benwell and Stokoe
have provided an excellent critical overview of the area of discourse and
identity” (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2007) “ …[an] erudite
and engaging book … one of the book's great strengths is its consistent
appeal to empirical analysis … their approach … is both eclectic
and original” (International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
2007) “ *****…this
book has saved me hours and hours of work! The range of examples and
references that the authors include here is wonderful; but more importantly,
their analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the theoretical
models that they look at has really helped me to make sense of what I was
reading elsewhere … Very helpful and I'd recommend it (though I'm not
telling anyone about it!) to anyone undertaking narrative research, or
research into identity construction” (Amazon.co.uk, 2008) “… Benwell and
Stokoe write in a remarkably clear and accessible way … the overview of
discourse-based approaches is unique for both its coverage and clarity
…” (Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2008) “ …
conspicuously strong on methodology … comprehensive, accessible and
insightful … crisply and engagingly written” (Discourse
Studies, 2008) “… the authors
demonstrate a refreshing breadth and depth of awareness of the way
[different] methodologies complement each other, as well as turning an
insightful and critical eye on some of the external and internal
contradictions” (Media International Australia, 2008) “ … a well researched and comprehensive overview of how to
approach identity within different methodological discourse traditions, from
micro approaches, such as Conversational Analysis; to macro approaches, such
as Critical Discourse Analysis” (Sociolinguistic Studies, 2008) “…an excellent
overview of the area of discourse and identity … provide[s] an
excellent comparison of the relative strengths and weaknesses of [different]
approaches” (Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 2010) ·
▪ · articles
and book chapters ·
▪ · ·
▪ · ·submitted … in press … forthcoming
·
▪ · Stokoe,
E., & Attenborough, F.T. (2013). Gender and categorial systematics. In S.
Ehrlich & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.). Handbook of Language and Gender (2nd
edition). Oxford: Blackwell. Stokoe,
E., & Attenborough, F.T. (forthcoming). On prospective and retrospective
categorization: The systematics of categorial analysis. In R. Fitzgerald
& W. Housley (Eds.). Membership categorization analysis: Studies of
social knowledge in action. Tba. Stokoe,
E. (forthcoming). Talk in training; talk in practice: Social psychology,
research methods, and the ‘interactional imperative’. Manuscript
in preparation. Speer,
S.A., & Stokoe, E. (forthcoming). Flirting: Designedly ambiguous actions
in interpersonal attraction. Manuscript in preparation. Stokoe,
E. (forthcoming). The (in)authenticity of simulated
talk: Comparing role-played and ‘real’ conversation. Manuscript
in preparation. Meredith,
J., & Stokoe, E. (forthcoming). Repair and correction in online
interaction. Manuscript submitted. Speer,
S.A., & Stokoe, E. (forthcoming). Ethics in action: Consent-gaining
interactions and implications for research practice. Manuscript submitted. · ▪
· 2012 · ▪ · Attenborough,
F.T., & Stokoe, E. (2012). Student life; student identity; student experience:
Ethnomethodological methods for pedagogical matters. Psychology, Learning & Teaching, 11 (1), ***-***. Stokoe,
E. (2012). “You know how men are”: Description, categorization
and the anatomy of a categorial practice. Gender
and Language, 6 (1), 231-253. Stokoe,
E., Hepburn, A., & Antaki, C. (2012). Beware the ‘Loughborough
School’? Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, online first:
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x Stokoe,
E., & Edwards, D. (2012). Mundane morality and gender in familial
neighbour disputes. In J. Cromdal & M. Tholander
(Eds.), Morality
in practice: Exploring childhood, parenthood and schooling in everyday life. Stokoe,
E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods
for systematic analysis. Discourse
Studies, 14 (3), ***-***. Special issue on Categories and social
interaction: Current issues in membership categorization. With
responses
Fitzgerald, F. (2012). Membership
Categorisation Analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the
joy of Sacks. Gardner, R. (2012). Enriching CA
through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys. Rapley, T. (2012). Order,
order: A ‘modest’
response to Stokoe. Silverman, D. (2012). Beyond armed
camps: A response to Stokoe. Whitehead, K. (2012). Moving
forward by doing analysis. Stokoe,
E. (2012). Categorial systematics. Discourse
Studies, 14 (3), ***-***. · ▪
· 2011 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E. (2011). Key Researcher: Social interactions and relationships. In P.
Dickerson. Social Psychology:
Traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: Pearson. Stokoe,
E. (2011). Overcoming roadblocks to mediation: Training mediators using the
‘Conversation Analytic Role-play Method’. Mediation Digest Online. Stokoe,
E. (2011). Simulated
interaction and communication skills training: The ‘Conversation
Analytic Role-play Method’. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation
analysis: Changing institutional practices. Edwards, D., &
Stokoe, E. (2011). “You
don’t have to answer”: Lawyers’ contributions in police
interrogations of suspects. Research on
Language and Social Interaction, 44
(1), 21-43. Stokoe,
E. (2011). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices
for occasioning audience laughter in television ‘sitcoms’ (pp.
16-34). In J.E. Richardson
& J.D. Burridge (Eds.), Analyzing media discourses. London: Routledge
(ISBN: 978-0-415-61858-8). Stokoe,
E. (2011). “Girl – woman – sorry!”:
On the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories (pp. 85-111).
In S. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Speer,
S., & Stokoe, E. (2011). Conversation and gender: An introduction (pp.
1-27). In Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. · ▪ · 2010 · ▪ · McCabe,
S., & Stokoe, E. (2010). “Have you been away?”:
Stokoe, E. (2010).
“Have you been married, or…?” Eliciting and accounting for
relationship histories in speed-dating encounters. Research on Language
and Social Interaction, 43 (3), 260-282. Ikeda, K. (2010).
Identity and naturally-occurring interaction: An interview with Elizabeth Stokoe. The Language
Teacher, 33 (3). Stokoe, E., &
Edwards, D. (2010). “I
advise you not to answer that question”: Conversation analysis, legal
interaction and the analysis of lawyers’ turns in police interrogations
of suspects (pp. 155-168). In A.
Johnson & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Routledge handbook in forensic linguistics.
Benwell,
B.M., & Stokoe, E. (2010). Identity in social action: Conversation,
narratives and genealogies (pp. 56-77). In M. Wetherell
& C.T. Mohanty (Eds.), The Sage handbook of
identities. Benwell,
B., & Stokoe, E. (2010). University students resisting academic identity
(pp. 82-97). In P. Griffiths, A.J. Merrison, & A. Bloomer (Eds.), Language
in use: A reader. London: Routledge. ISBN:
978-0-415-44205-3. Stokoe,
E., & Edwards, D. (2010). Asking ostensibly silly questions in police interrogations
(pp. 108-132). In A.F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional
discourse. Stokoe,
E. (2010). Gender, conversation analysis, and the anatomy of membership
categorization practices. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,
1-12, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x Stokoe, E. (2010). “I’m
not gonna hit a lady”: Conversation analysis,
membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse
& Society, 21(1), 1-24. · ▪ · 2009 · ▪ · Stokoe, E. (2009).
Foreword. In The State of the
Nation’s Neighbours. Published by Mastercard / The Big Lunch. Stokoe, E., &
Edwards, D. (2009). Accomplishing social action with identity
categories: Mediating neighbour complaints (pp. 95-115). In M. Wetherell (Ed.), Theorizing identities and social
action. Stokoe,
E. (2009). “I’ve got a girlfriend”: Police officers doing
‘self-disclosure’ in their interrogations of suspects. Narrative
Inquiry, 19 (1), 154-182. Stokoe,
E. (2009). “For the benefit of the tape”: Formulating embodied
conduct in designedly uni-modal recorded
police-suspect interrogations. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (10),
1887-1904. Stokoe,
E. (2009). Doing actions with identity categories: Complaints and denials in
neighbour disputes. Text and Talk, 29 (1), 75-97. · ▪ · 2008 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E. (2008). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices
for occasioning audience laughter in television ‘sitcoms’. Social
Semiotics, 18 (3), 289-307. Stokoe, E. (2008).
Categories and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction (pp.
139-157). In
K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston & J.
Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies.
Basingstoke: Palgrave. ISBN: 023055069X. Stokoe,
E., & Edwards, D. (2008). “Did you have permission to smash your
neighbour’s door?” Silly questions and their answers in police-suspect
interrogations. Discourse Studies, 10 (1), 89-111. ·
▪ · 2007 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E., & Edwards, D. (2007). Story formulations in talk-in-interaction (pp.
69-79). In M. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative: State of the art. Edwards,
D., & Stokoe, E. (2007). Self-help in calls for help with problem
neighbours. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1), 9-32. Stokoe,
E.H. (2007). Talking about gender: The conversational construction of gender
categories in academic discourse (pp. 374-396). In J. Potter (Ed.), Discourse
and psychology. Stokoe,
E., & Hepburn, A. (2007). “You can hear a lot through the
walls”: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints (pp. 468-493). In J.
Potter (Ed.), Discourse and psychology. Stokoe, E., &
Edwards, D. (2007). “Black this, black that”: Racial insults and
reported speech in neighbour complaints and police
interrogations. Discourse & Society, 18 (3), 337-372. · ▪ · 2006 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E. (2006). Public intimacy in neighbour relationships and complaints. Sociological
Research Online, 11 (3)
<www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/stokoe.html>. Stokoe,
E. (2006). On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial
reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. Sociological Review, 54
(3), 467-494. (Special issue ‘New
Horizons in Ethnomethodology’). Stokoe,
E., & Edwards, D. (2006). Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative
Inquiry, 16 (1), 59-68. Stokoe,
E., & Smithson, J. (2006). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis
and gender categories in interaction (pp. 184-189). In J. Sunderland (Ed.), Language
and gender: An advanced resource book. · ▪ · 2005 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E., & Hepburn, A. (2005). “You can hear a lot through the
walls”: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints. Discourse &
Society, 16 (5), 647-673. Stokoe,
E.H. (2005). Analysing gender and language. Journal of Sociolinguistics,
9 (1), 118-133. Stokoe,
E.H., & Wiggins, S.K. (2005). Discursive approaches (pp. 161-174). In P.
Gilbert & J.N.V. Miles (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in
clinical and health psychology. Smithson, J., &
Stokoe, E.H. (2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating “genderblind” terms in organizations. Gender,
Work & Organization, 12 (2), 147-168. · ▪ · 2004 · ▪ · Benwell, B.M., &
Stokoe, E.H. (2004). University students resisting academic identity (pp.
124-139). In P. Seedhouse & K. Richards (Eds.),
Applying conversation analysis. Edwards, D., &
Stokoe, E.H. (2004). Discursive psychology, focus group interviews, and
participants’ categories. British Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 22, 499-507. McCabe,
S., & Stokoe, E.H. (2004). Place and identity in ‘day
visitor’ narratives. Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (3),
601-622. Stokoe,
E.H. (2004). Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current
developments in language and gender research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1 (2), 107-129. · ▪ · 2003 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E.H., & Wallwork, J. (2003). Space invaders:
The moral-spatial order in neighbour dispute discourse. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 42, 551-569. Stokoe,
E.H. (2003). Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership
categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology, 13
(3), 317-344. Stokoe,
E.H. (2003). Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in
language and gender research. International Sociolinguistics,
2(1). Available online:
www.crisaps.org/newsletter/backissue/stokoe_back.pdf · ▪ · 2002 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E.H., & Smithson, J. (2002) Gender and sexuality in talk-in-interaction:
Considering a conversation analytic perspective (pp. 79-110). In P. McIlvenny (Ed.). Talking gender and sexuality:
Conversation, performativity and discourse in interaction. Stokoe,
E.H., & Weatherall, A. (2002). Gender,
language, conversation analysis and feminism. Discourse & Society,
13 (6), 707-713. Benwell,
B.M., & Stokoe, E.H. (2002). The construction of discussion tasks in
university tutorials. Discourse Studies, 4 (4), 429-453. · ▪ · 2001 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E.H., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation
analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society,
12 (2), 243-269. Abell, J.,
& Stokoe, E.H. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing
culturally situated identities in Princess Diana’s
‘Panorama’ interview. British Journal of Social Psychology,
40, 417-435. · ▪ · 2000 · ▪ · Stokoe,
E.H. (2000). Constructing topicality in university students’
small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language &
Education 14(3): 184-203. Stokoe,
E.H. (2000). Towards a conversation analytic approach to gender and
discourse. Feminism & Psychology, 10 (4), 552-563. Abell, J.,
Stokoe, E.H., & Billig, M. (2000). Narrative
and the discursive (re)construction of events (pp. 180-192). In M. Andrews,
S.D. Sclater, C. Squire & A. Treacher (Eds.) Lines of narrative. ·
▪ ·
1995-1999 ·
▪ · Abell, J.,
& Stokoe, E.H. (1999). “I take full responsibility, I take some
responsibility, I’ll take half of it but no
more than that”: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the
Panorama interview. Discourse Studies, 1 (3), 297-319. Abell, J. & Stokoe, E.H. (1998). Who’s to
blame? Princess Diana, accountability, and the management of blame in the
‘Panorama’ interview. In R. Forrester and C. Percy (Eds.) Proceedings
of the International Conference on Discourse and the Social Order. Stokoe,
E.H. (1998). Talking about gender: the conversational construction of gender
categories in academic discourse. Discourse & Society, 9
(2), 217-240. Stokoe,
E.H. (1997). An evaluation of two studies of gender and language in
educational settings. Gender & Education, 9 (2), 233-244. Stokoe,
E. (1995). Gender differences in undergraduates’ talk: Contrasting
analyses and what they offer. Feminism & Psychology, 5 (1),
99-104. |
