welcome
what is it?
doing it
ethics of dfsb
understanding the user
how others have done it
news & events
about us


 

ethics of design for sustainable behaviour

Design for sustainable behaviour is an emerging activity under the banner of sustainable design which aims to reduce the environmental and social impacts of products by moderating users’ interaction with them. Influence can be exerted to a greater or lesser extent through the selection of appropriate strategies.

Designers’ ability to influence user behaviour and the resulting tension between choice and control raises some interesting ethical issues. Interventions which steer user behaviour towards more sustainable behaviour without restricting interaction may be more widely accepted than those which exert greater control. Coercive, automated or ubiquitous technologies, however, could arguably be more effective than informative ones in ensuring change, but is it better to educate the consumer and risk failure or overrule users and “force” behavioural changes in order to achieve demonstrable results?

assessment tools:

Research conducted by Lilley and Lofthouse [1,2] resulted in the development of a suite of assessment tools which may better equip designers to influence consumption patterns without compromising users’ autonomy and privacy.

matrix [A] identifying and evaluating the impacts of user behaviour:
a weighted matrix which facilitates the evaluation of behavioural issues identified through observing users interacting with existing products against three parameters; the impact on society and the environment, the longevity of the effects produced and the permanency of the conditions resulting from the effects of user behaviours identified. Prompt questions such as; “could the continued practice of this behaviour damage or degrade the environment (either locally or globally)?” are provided to aid analysis. To begin using this tool <download matrix A>.
matrix [B]   identifying and evaluating behaviours resulting from design concepts:
a weighted matrix which encourages reflection on the ways in which a re-designed product could be used and who may be affected by its use either directly or indirectly. Behaviours are rated in terms of their severity and longevity, the permanency of the consequences of that behaviour and the likelihood of that behaviour occurring. Those which score highly in terms of impact, are considered long term, irreversible and have a high or medium probability of occurring can be highlighted for deeper consideration. To begin using this tool <download matrix B>
good design checklist   assessing the environmental, social and ethical impacts of design concepts:
a checklist of probing prompt questions to encourage designers to consider a range of social, environmental, economic and ethical considerations when evaluating design concepts such as; the designers intent; validity of the targeted behaviour; level of control exerted and whether this can be justified in relation to the perceived severity of the behaviour targeted; privacy and security issues related to data collection, transfer and storage, accuracy, reliability and trustworthiness; and the overall impact on stakeholders. To begin using this tool <download the good design checklist>.


For more information on these tools and more detail on the ethical issues associated with design for sustainable behaviour read:

Lilley. D and Lofthouse. V. A (2010) Teaching Ethics for Design for Sustainable Behaviour: A Pilot Study, Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, Vol. 15, No.2, June 2010, pp. 55-68

If you use these tools to support practical design activities within teaching, research or industry please do credit the Sustainable Design Research Group and e-mail any feedback to debra.  

 

References:
[1] Lilley. D and Lofthouse. V. A (2010) Teaching Ethics for Design for Sustainable Behaviour: A Pilot Study, Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, Vol. 15, No.2, June 2010, pp. 55-68
[2] Lofthouse. V. A and Lilley. D (2009) Teaching Ethics in Design: A Review of Current Practice, In: International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'09, 24th-27th August 2009, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA


This content was updated:  17/07/2011